Regulatory evidence is manual
Compliance evidence is assembled by hand before every review, with no continuous way to prove controls held all year.
Banks, fintechs, insurers and finance companies face constant regulatory scrutiny and zero tolerance for downtime. We build identity-first, observable infrastructure with evidence ready before the auditor asks.
Compliance evidence is assembled by hand before every review, with no continuous way to prove controls held all year.
Core banking platforms turn every new product or channel into a multi-quarter integration project.
Attackers target credentials and payment flows constantly, and detection tuned for noise misses what matters.
Regulators and internal risk teams expect evidence for every vendor and cloud dependency, not just your own systems.
| Framework | What it requires | How we address it |
|---|---|---|
| GLBA Safeguards Rule / FFIEC | A written information security program, risk assessment and examiner-ready controls for financial institutions. | Control mapping, hardening, continuous evidence. |
| FFIEC Business Continuity Management | Tested resilience and recovery plans for critical financial services. | DR design, tested failover, recovery drills. |
| CFPB Section 1033 open-banking rule | Secure, standards-based API access to customer financial data. | API security gateway, consent management, monitoring. |
| PCI DSS v4 | Protection of cardholder data across storage, processing and transmission. | Network segmentation, encryption, scope reduction. |
| SOX ITGC / NYDFS Part 500 | IT general controls over financial reporting and state cybersecurity program requirements. | Change governance, access reviews, governed landing zones, policy as code. |
Focus areas: least-privilege identity, audit trails, resilience, risk reporting, and governed AI adoption.
Identity-first access, tuned detection and continuous evidence mapped directly to FFIEC / GLBA controls.
Modernize core and digital-channel infrastructure on a governed foundation without losing the audit trail.
A trusted fraud-analytics and reporting platform built on governed, reconciled financial data.
Governed AI for internal knowledge, document review and operations that survives risk and compliance review.
A secure developer platform so digital-channel teams ship faster without breaking control evidence.
Continuous monitoring, patching and recovery testing for systems that can't have unplanned downtime.
Continuous, exportable evidence mapped to GLBA and PCI controls, not assembled before each review.
Secure, standards-based API access to customer data with consent and monitoring built in.
A governed data foundation that powers fraud and account-takeover analytics.
Golden-path CI/CD and access controls so digital-channel teams ship without reinventing security.
Tested disaster recovery for the systems that can't have unplanned downtime.
AI assistants for internal knowledge and operations with access controls that pass risk review.
Customers and staff reach digital channels through identity-verified access; an API gateway connects core banking, payments and open-banking integrations; data lands in a governed platform; security monitoring and evidence collection span every layer.
Each phase leaves a documented control or piece of evidence in place, not just a recommendation.
Assess current control posture, evidence gaps and the specific GLBA/PCI scope you're measured against.
Design identity, network segmentation and evidence pipelines mapped to FFIEC / GLBA and PCI DSS scope.
Roll out least-privilege access, tuned detection and automated evidence collection across core and digital channels.
Test detections, failover and evidence exports against real regulator and PCI assessor expectations.
Hand over incident response runbooks, evidence dashboards and recovery drill schedules.
Every control ships with the evidence it needs to produce, so the next FFIEC exam or PCI assessment is a routine export.
Short answers to common planning questions for Financial Services.
Yes. We document the control environment, data flows and risk assessment that examiners expect under the interagency guidance on third-party relationships.
Yes. We design for US-region hosting where regulation requires it, and document data residency for examiner and GLBA review.
Yes. We work on identity, security, integration and hosting around your core platform; we don't replace vendor application support.
Yes. Network segmentation and tokenization are common ways we reduce how much of your environment falls inside PCI scope, lowering audit cost and risk.
A short security and compliance gap assessment against the specific framework you're measured on, ending with a prioritized roadmap.
30-minute call · no obligation · reply within one business day.
Questions are not stored. Avoid sharing confidential information. Privacy Policy