Identity-first access
Least-privilege access and conditional policies so a stolen password is worth very little. Identity is treated as the real perimeter.
Two things go wrong a lot. Security looks good, but no one can run it. And audit prep is a rush through spreadsheets two weeks before the audit. Both leave you at risk.
We build identity-first, least-privilege security into the platform and wire up continuous evidence: Sentinel for detection, Defender for posture, structured logging for the audit trail. When the auditor asks "show me," you can, without a fire drill.
Least-privilege access and conditional policies so a stolen password is worth very little. Identity is treated as the real perimeter.
Sentinel and Defender configured to surface real threats, not a firehose of noise your team learns to ignore.
Control status is visible day to day, so an audit is a routine export, not a two-week spreadsheet scramble.
A defined incident path with clear owners, agreed before anything goes wrong rather than improvised during it.
These services can be delivered independently or combined into a larger roadmap.
Identity-first cloud security: posture management, least-privilege access and detection built into the platform, not added later.
Get real value from the Microsoft security stack you're already paying for: Defender, Sentinel, Entra and Purview, working together.
Enterprise Microsoft Sentinel deployment: KQL detection engineering, automated SOAR playbooks, AMA log ingestion and NIST SP 800-53 compliance.
Deploy Microsoft Defender across cloud, endpoints and identity: unified threat protection with posture management for compliance.
Identity is the new perimeter: Entra ID, conditional access, MFA and least-privilege, done to a Zero Trust standard.
Continuous compliance engineering for the United States: NIST CSF 2.0, NIST SP 800-53, FFIEC / GLBA, CCPA/CPRA, and SOC 2 Type II readiness.
Compliance requirements and threat models differ by sector. We map identity, detection and evidence controls to what each industry is actually audited against.
Identity-first controls and continuous evidence built for FFIEC and regulator-driven audit cycles, without slowing down transaction systems.
Least-privilege access and monitored detection that protect patient data while keeping clinical systems usable for staff.
Controls and audit evidence mapped to NIST CSF 2.0 and CCPA/CPRA requirements for public-sector cloud and on-prem environments.
Each phase leaves a documented control or piece of evidence in place, not just a recommendation.
Assess current identity posture, detection coverage and the specific framework (SOC 2, NIST CSF 2.0, ISO 27001) you're being measured against.
Design the identity, detection and evidence model: conditional access policies, Sentinel/Defender configuration and what evidence each control needs to produce.
Roll out least-privilege access, tuned Sentinel/Defender detections and structured logging so evidence is captured automatically, not reconstructed later.
Test detections against real attack scenarios and confirm evidence exports match what auditors will actually ask for.
Hand over incident response runbooks, detection tuning guidance and evidence dashboards so audits become a routine export.
Every control ships with the evidence it needs to produce, so the audit becomes a routine export instead of a two-week scramble.
Map current controls against the framework you are audited on and leave with a prioritized remediation roadmap.
Best for: teams preparing for their first formal auditImplement least-privilege access, tuned Sentinel/Defender detections and structured evidence logging.
Best for: a known gap list that needs to become working controlsDetection tuning, incident response and continuous evidence management for environments already in production.
Best for: teams who want audit-readiness maintained year-roundCase studies are shared where details can be published without exposing confidential client information.
Ongoing control checks and repeatable fixes, so you stay ready for SOC 2.
Read the storyShort answers to common planning questions for Cybersecurity & Compliance.
It depends on your current posture, but most organizations move from assessment to a defensible control set in 8-13 weeks, with evidence collection running continuously after that.
Usually not. We build on Microsoft Sentinel and Defender where you already have Microsoft 365 or Azure, and integrate with what else is in place rather than ripping it out.
Least-privilege and conditional access are designed around how your team actually works, so approved access stays fast; it's unauthorized access that gets blocked.
Structured logging and evidence pipelines capture control status continuously, so you can show a control was enforced on every day of the audit window, not just the day someone checked.
Yes, incident response runbooks and escalation paths are part of delivery, and managed security operations covers ongoing detection and response.
Tell us which framework you're being measured against. We'll show you what evidence-ready looks like before the auditor asks.
Questions are not stored. Avoid sharing confidential information. Privacy Policy